Skip to main content

The Marketing of Knowledge

I was recently asked – “Why aren’t you selling your knowledge?”

In fact I’ve sold knowledge for more years than I care to count.
Usually the sale is in a form where the knowledge is a part of the package I bring to bear in the course of fulfilling a professional role.

Through the offices of ffox Software Ltd, I have also traded services as an advisor based on my knowledge and experience. How knowledge dissemination is delivered always depends on the needs of both the seller and the buyer at the point of the trade.

Other than day to day purchase of professional advice in areas of accountancy, law, medicine and (in some cases) IT, my experience is that the purchase of knowledge is often a course of action pursued by buyers who seek a ‘magic carpet’ solution to an issue that has not been clearly identified or defined.

The thing I find strange is that the purchase of knowledge is often fuelled by fear.

So what fears drive the potential purchasers of knowledge to the point where they seek sellers of that commodity?

The fear that the ability to act will be compromised by not knowing?
The fear that if action is taken it will be the wrong action?
The fear that action is perceived to be required in such a time space that there is insufficient time to allow for full analysis of the issue?

These fears all focus on the perceived lack of ability to act.

Peter Senge wrote - "Knowledge is the capacity for effective action."

Very nicely put. In fact the only time anyone should need to purchase knowledge is when there is insufficient time to learn.

Even then, if I were buying knowledge I would want the deal to include the right to retention of that knowledge for later retrieval. In other words I would want to learn from the experience.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Law and Order: The Anonymous Text Tip-Off

The following article came out of an interview conducted with Max Doleh - Law enforcement organisations and Crime Stopper programs are turning to technology which enables text tip-off from the public to facilitate a police response. In September 2007 Master Sergeant Charles Phillips of the Oklahoma City Police Department published an item on the Oklahoma City Crime Stoppers web site (http://www.okccrimetips.com/ ) calling for increased resources to bring this technology to OKC. In November 2007 it was announced that Crime Stoppers of Oklahoma City have engaged technology company ProductiveT to develop an SMS system that is radically different to others in use in the country. Max Doleh, ProductiveT president and CEO answers questions – 1 . What makes the Oklahoma City system so different? The ProductiveT technology differs greatly from other offerings. The police department have their own dedicated number for receiving the messages and unlike most systems there is no need for the sender

Leadership: So you want to be Powerful?

Throughout my life, in both business and personal spheres I have found that individuals seeking answers invariably look for 'silver bullet' solutions.     In a recent post on LinkedIn a n Influencer wrote that she had been asked the question ' Who is the most powerful person you ever met? '     The question was posed by a 17 year old and the author guessed that the answer being sought was the name of some sort of X-Factor figure, This strikes a cord with me. Throughout my life, in both business and personal spheres I have found that individuals seeking answers invariably look for 'silver bullet' solutions. This applies to all generations, 'Boomer, X-Gen and Millennial, it applies to individuals of all levels of intelligence, and to individuals at all levels of authority.     The desire for someo ne to appear, like a genie from a lamp, wit h either ' the answer' to a problem , or ' the power' to solve the problem, or

Team Management – The less stressful way.

It’s your dream team. Everything is in place, all they need is a little bit more tweaking and they’ll be perfect. Then it happens. Somebody hands in their notice and leaves. And it’s not just the loss of one individual. It’s the strain on the others as they try to make up the shortage. Recruitment takes time. Get by that and it’s followed by even more stress as the newbie takes up more resources in the training phase. Even when it’s all done, you know the adjustments will keep them below peak performance for several months. That’s the period when other team members begin complaining about the extra work load and start to look around at other jobs. Control is easy. You just use the good old disciplinary process. Fine tuning a team is harder with many more plates to juggle. People are just plain unpredictable, or are they? Recent research by Gallup Consulting reveals a pretty convincing case for active engagement of employees, claiming that engaged employees are – More profitable More cu